Re: [HACKERS] New SQL counter statistics view (pg_stat_sql)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> +void
> +pgstat_count_sqlstmt(const char *commandTag)
> +{
> + PgStat_SqlstmtEntry *htabent;
> + bool found;
> +
> + if (!pgstat_track_sql)
> + return
>
> Callers of pgstat_count_sqlstmt are always ensuring that
> pgstat_track_sql is true, seems it's redundant here.

I have done testing of the feature, it's mostly working as per the expectation.

I have few comments/questions.

--------
If you execute the query with EXECUTE then commandTag will be EXECUTE
that way we will not show the actual query type, I mean all the
statements will get the common tag "EXECUTE".

You can try this.
PREPARE fooplan (int) AS INSERT INTO t VALUES($1);
EXECUTE fooplan(1);

------

+ /* Destroy the SQL statement counter stats HashTable */
+ hash_destroy(pgstat_sql);
+
+ /* Create SQL statement counter Stats HashTable */

I think in the patch we have used mixed of "Stats HashTable" and
"stats HashTable", I think better
to be consistent throughout the patch. Check other similar instances.

----------------

@@ -1102,6 +1102,12 @@ exec_simple_query(const char *query_string)
 PortalDrop(portal, false);

+ /*
+ * Count SQL statement for pg_stat_sql view
+ */
+ if (pgstat_track_sql)
+ pgstat_count_sqlstmt(commandTag);

We are only counting the successful SQL statement, Is that intentional?

------
I have noticed that pgstat_count_sqlstmt is called from
exec_simple_query and exec_execute_message. Don't we want to track the
statement executed from functions?
-------

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com