Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dilip Kumar
Тема Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Дата
Msg-id CAFiTN-tVUocDK8Gi=rUs+4xUX35zApV725TtYdPX8qoYH7wsXA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 11:07 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 4:40 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have explored this area more and also tried to come up with a
> working prototype, so while working on this I realized that we would
> have almost to execute all the code which is getting generated as part
> of the dumpDatabase() and dumpACL() which is basically,
>
> 1. UPDATE pg_catalog.pg_database SET datistemplate = false
> 2. DROP DATABASE
> 3. CREATE DATABASE with all the database properties like ENCODING,
> LOCALE_PROVIDER, LOCALE, LC_COLLATE, LC_CTYPE, ICU_LOCALE,
> COLLATION_VERSION, TABLESPACE
> 4. COMMENT ON DATABASE
> 5. Logic inside dumpACL()
>
> I feel duplicating logic like this is really error-prone, but I do not
> find any clear way to reuse the code as dumpDatabase() has a high
> dependency on the Archive handle and generating the dump file.

Yeah, I don't think this is the way to go at all. The duplicated logic
is likely to get broken, and is also likely to annoy the next person
who has to maintain it.

Right 
 
I suggest that for now we fall back on making the initial
RelFileNumber for a system table equal to pg_class.oid. I don't really
love that system and I think maybe we should change it at some point
in the future, but all the alternatives seem too complicated to cram
them into the current patch.

That makes sense.

On a separate note, while reviewing the latest patch I see there is some risk of using the unflushed relfilenumber in GetNewRelFileNumber() function.  Basically, in the current code, the flushing logic is tightly coupled with the logging new relfilenumber logic and that might not work with all the values of the VAR_RELNUMBER_NEW_XLOG_THRESHOLD.  So the idea is we need to keep the flushing logic separate from the logging, I am working on the idea and I will post the patch soon.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: torikoshia
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Sharma
Дата:
Сообщение: confirmed_flush_lsn shows LSN of the data that has not yet been received by the logical subscriber.