Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dilip Kumar
Тема Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
Дата
Msg-id CAFiTN-sHefPcYwxybSwLUGQsdHMmrGBxphRWALiaEKNKRyGqxg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration  (Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration  (Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:49 AM Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 5:02 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > does not apply on top of HEAD as in [1], please post a rebased patch:
> >
> Thanks! Here's the rebase.

I was looking into this patch, it seems like three different
optimizations are squeezed in a single patch
1) dividing buffer space in banks to reduce the seq search cost 2) guc
parameter for buffer size scale 3) some of the buffer size values are
modified compared to what it is on the head.  I think these are 3
patches which should be independently committable.

While looking into the first idea of dividing the buffer space in
banks, I see that it will speed up finding the buffers but OTOH while
searching the victim buffer it will actually can hurt the performance
the slru pages which are frequently accessed are not evenly
distributed across the banks.  So imagine the cases where we have some
banks with a lot of empty slots and other banks from which we
frequently have to evict out the pages in order to get the new pages
in.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: delay starting WAL receiver
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply