Re: Re: Binary Large Objects (LOB/BLOB) in Hibernate and JDBC: Unresolved issues

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stefan Keller
Тема Re: Re: Binary Large Objects (LOB/BLOB) in Hibernate and JDBC: Unresolved issues
Дата
Msg-id CAFcOn2-pCnpCmeMjUq-X5AVJgvLztfGPSS=MkN0CJYp2S5Rruw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Binary Large Objects (LOB/BLOB) in Hibernate and JDBC: Unresolved issues  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения 
2012/1/8 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>:>  So it's clearly a
Hibernate bug.

Obviously not :->
Hibernate mapping just uses one of two valid variants to map large
objects in JDBC.
So, AFAIK it's a PostgreSQL JDBC bug and an omission in the JDBC docs as well.

Stefan

2012/1/8 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>:
> Stefan Keller wrote on 08.01.2012 20:35:
>
>> 2012/1/8 Thomas Kellerer<spam_eater@gmx.net>:
>> What's the reason for you to stick with LargeObjects?
>>
>> I simply used the @Lob annotation in Hibernate/JPA.
>> That's all to get a leaking pg_largeobject table.
>> See http://relation.to/Bloggers/PostgreSQLAndBLOBs,
>> https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-2244 and
>> https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-4876 for some background of
>> the dilemma.
>
>  So it's clearly a Hibernate bug.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stefan Keller
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Binary Large Objects (LOB/BLOB) in Hibernate and JDBC: Unresolved issues
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Supporting SQL/MED DATALINK