<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br />On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Euler Taveira <<a
href="mailto:euler@timbira.com.br">euler@timbira.com.br</a>>wrote:<br />><br />> On 13-03-2014 00:11, Fabrízio
deRoyes Mello wrote:<br /> > > Shouldn't the "ALTER" statements below raise an exception?<br />> ><br
/>>For consistency, yes. Who cares? I mean, there is no harm in resetting<br />> an unrecognized parameter. Have
inmind that tighten it up could break<br /> > scripts. In general, I'm in favor of validating things.<br />><br
/></div><divclass="gmail_extra"><br />I know this could break scripts, but I think a consistent behavior should be
raisean exception when an option doesn't exists.<br /><br />> euler@euler=# reset noname;<br />> ERROR: 42704:
unrecognizedconfiguration parameter "noname"<br />> LOCAL: set_config_option, guc.c:5220<br />><br /><br
/></div><divclass="gmail_extra">This is a consistent behavior.<br /><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Regards,<br
/></div><divclass="gmail_extra"><br />--<br />Fabrízio de Royes Mello<br />Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL<br
/>>>Timbira: <a href="http://www.timbira.com.br">http://www.timbira.com.br</a><br /> >> Blog sobre TI: <a
href="http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com">http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com</a><br/>>> Perfil Linkedin: <a
href="http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello">http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello</a><br/> >> Twitter: <a
href="http://twitter.com/fabriziomello">http://twitter.com/fabriziomello</a></div></div>