Re: Time-Delayed Standbys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Тема Re: Time-Delayed Standbys
Дата
Msg-id CAFcNs+qD0AJ=qzhsHD9+v_Mhz0RTBJ=cJPCT_T=uT_JvvnC1FQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Time-Delayed Standbys  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Time-Delayed Standbys
Список pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12 December 2013 15:19, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Don't panic guys! I meant UTC offset only. And yes, it may not be
> > > needed, will check.
> >
> > Checked, all non-UTC TZ offsets work without further effort here.
> >
>
> Thanks!
>

Reviewing the committed patch I noted that the "CheckForStandbyTrigger()" after the delay was removed.

If we promote the standby during the delay and don't check the trigger immediately after the delay, then we will replay undesired WALs records.

The attached patch add this check.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christophe Pettus
Дата:
Сообщение: "stuck spinlock"
Следующее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good