Thanks for your review.
> - <entry>any numeric, string, date/time, network, or enum type,
> + <entry>any numeric, string, date/time, network, lsn, or enum type,
> or arrays of these types</entry>
> <entry>same as argument type</entry>
> In the documentation it refereed as pg_lsn type rather than lsn alone
Fixed.
> +Datum
> +pg_lsn_larger(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> +{
> + XLogRecPtr lsn1 = PG_GETARG_LSN(0);
> + XLogRecPtr lsn2 = PG_GETARG_LSN(1);
> + XLogRecPtr result;
> +
> + result = ((lsn1 > lsn2) ? lsn1 : lsn2);
> +
> + PG_RETURN_LSN(result);
> +}
>
> rather than using additional variable its more readable and effective to return the argument
> itself like we do in date data type and other place
>
Fixed.
New version attached.
Regards,
--