Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Hunsaker
Тема Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
Дата
Msg-id CAFaPBrQxjrrkF7WGiiVHna__FuFAsQ=PA3xAkP5kEzh=1ZaPjw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I wrote:

This thread seems to have died off without any clear resolution.  I'd
hoped somebody would try the patch on some nontrivial application to
see if it broke anything or caused any warnings, but it doesn't seem
like that is happening.


I tried it on a fairly typical web application. Around 5000 or so distinct statements according to pg_stat_statements. With operator_precedence_warning = on, no warnings yet.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators