transactions start time

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aleksei Arefjev
Тема transactions start time
Дата
Msg-id CAFTgB8iMS8LYLbdCTmv=RBzDHhFaCvEBG9CAD3EyDxzuBvyTMA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: transactions start time  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hi,

In statistical reports gathered by PgBadger on our PostgreSQL databases almost always we have in "Queries that took up the most time" report table information about transactions start time ('BEGIN;' command). Something like that in example below:

2    3h34m52.26s    48,556,167    0.00s    BEGIN;
                       
                        0.82s | BEGIN;
                        0.82s | BEGIN;
                        0.82s | BEGIN;
                        0.81s | BEGIN;
                        0.81s | BEGIN;
                        0.81s | BEGIN;
                        0.80s | BEGIN;
                        0.80s | BEGIN;
                        0.79s | BEGIN;
                        0.79s | BEGIN;

Databases placed on different hardware, OS - Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL 9.1

So, questions are:
1. Is this a normal situation with transactions start time ( BEGIN method) ?
2. How can we reduce transactions start time if it's possible in principle?
3. What happens in PostgreSQL on transaction starting time? Can someone describe this process in detail? (of course, I saw in PostgreSQL source code, for example, definition such kind functions, like StartTransaction function, but it's not so easy to understand for third-party researcher, that all of these operations mean in real for performance)

Best Regards

Aleksei

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: AI Rumman
Дата:
Сообщение: Why do I need more time with partition table?
Следующее
От: AI Rumman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why do I need more time with partition table?