Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state
От | Ajin Cherian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFPTHDayQok5oC571tR+3dOuASVn=-b2ujGAX-BRbm7FXGabNA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state ("cca5507" <cca5507@qq.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 2:47 PM cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > According to the comment above DecodeTXNNeedSkip(), transactions committed before SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT state won't be decoded.It's important for initial table data synchronization because the table sync workers use the consistent snapshotto copy data so transactions before SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT are already included in the initial data. > > This change may be redundant with SnapBuildXactNeedsSkip(), I add just for safe. > > -- I understand your explanation but was there a bug on HEAD that this is solving? If so, can you write a test case to show this? This will make it more convincing that this change as well is required. Your other change has a test case to confirm, but this doesn't. regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: