Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
От | Dominique Devienne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFCRh--CwoXZMq9WcaG7bAQQcQ6F-NZP2Z=PUgwnjKUtTBaz3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 5:18 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 17:03 +0200, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > OK with 16.9 and 17.5 (we cannot test on beta2 anymore) > > KO with 16.10 and 17.6 (and beta3 too, released at the same time) > > > > Which for a minor patch is a surprise to us, not in a good way. > > > > So... Did anything change around RLS in this patch series? > > Anything changed around ROLE INHERIT rules? > > > > The symptom is that a LOGIN user lacks ROLEs is used to have. > > So perhaps some GRANTs are now silently doing nothing, > > for some unknown reasons. > > > > What in these patches could be affecting those areas? > > Without a reproducer, that is a wild goose chase. Oh, it's easy to reproduce here... But distilling it down is no small feat. But this is a patch. Patches are not supposed to break things.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: