Re: Making pg_rewind faster
| От | Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Making pg_rewind faster |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFC+b6pfeK2LvUpSY-YtHfcHRsiW34XzA6YLYGMj6v6p6f7NZA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Making pg_rewind faster (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 6:46 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 05:51:54PM +0530, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla wrote:
> - * These files exist on the source and the target services, so they
> should
> + * These files exist on the source and the target servers, so they
> should
Not sure what my fingers were doing here.
> I think as we are not using mtime to show that the file has not been copied
> and been skipped ,instead we are doing the same with the debug message
> (qr/pg_wal\/$wal_seg_skipped \(NONE\)/,), so stat calculation of this WAL
> segment can be removed.
Yes, removing this one makes sense.
And, to keep it short: applied.
Thanks Michael.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: