Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAFBsxsHJYi8Q1EuSg=QV+ZGb08ej25XQA7jAcG49bJTqKhrrbA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 7:52 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 1:26 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Good point. While keeping the chunks in the small nodes in sorted
> > order is useful for visiting all keys in sorted order, additional
> > branches and memmove calls could be slow.
>
> Right, the ordering is a property that some users will need, so best to keep it. Although the node128 doesn't have that property -- too slow to do so, I think.

Nevermind, I must have been mixing up keys and values there...

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pruning never visible changes
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13