Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals
| От | John Naylor | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFBsxsGW=pHSitw5gY=CP1ctBAuz8+cFXiZkiB2fZXkuUh_6xQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 7:43 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 30.03.21 18:06, John Naylor wrote:
> > Currently, when the origin is after the input, the result is the
> > timestamp at the end of the bin, rather than the beginning as expected.
> > The attached puts the result consistently at the beginning of the bin.
>
> In the patch
>
> + if (origin > timestamp && stride_usecs > 1)
> + tm_delta -= stride_usecs;
>
> is the condition stride_usecs > 1 really necessary? My assessment is
> that it's not, in which case it would be better to omit it.
Without the condition, the case of 1 microsecond will fail to be a no-op. This case has no practical use, but it still must work correctly, just as date_trunc('microsecond', input) does.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: