Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAFBsxsGFUpMFM950JJx=YeSxM6oCk27R5NM2v-VhQmVK_mSWjw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 9:24 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> FWIW, I think the best path forward would be to do something similar to the
> simplehash.h approach, so it can be customized to the specific user.

I figured that would come up at some point. It may be worth doing in the future, but I think it's way too much to ask for the first use case.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rename some rel truncation related constants at the top of vacuumlazy.c
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name