Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
Дата
Msg-id CAFBsxsFi3E5hxC20M6RznzP-wGWNBr8R9YEgGz9-L_etffXnJQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:28 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The patch looks good to me. But I can't come up with a stable test for
> > this. It seems to be hard without stopping and resuming parallel
> > vacuum workers. Do you have any good idea?
> >
>
> No, let's wait for a day or so to see if anybody else has any ideas to
> write a test for this case, otherwise, I'll check these once again and
> push.

I set this "committed" in the CF app.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c