Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.
Дата
Msg-id CAFBsxsFD+M4u4ZXnSQAWhp3cXYGWEA7o6kaPW_qi9e=Xi5NcBg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:12 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:

> > FWIW, docs need to hold to a higher standard than code comments.
>
> Thanks. In general, I agree that the docs and error/log messages
> (user-facing) need to be of higher standard, but at the same time code
> comments too IMHO. Because many hackers/developers consider code
> comments a great place to learn the internals, being consistent there
> does no harm.

git log and git blame are more useful when they are free of minor
stylistic changes. Of course, corrections and clarity are different
matters that are worth fixing in the comments. I've pushed the doc
fixes, thanks for the patch!


--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Time to increase hash_mem_multiplier default?
Следующее
От: walther@technowledgy.de
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Add reloption for views to enable RLS