Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Дата
Msg-id CAFBsxsE7_cjwzu1OvmMTRf+mLfpB3vLk3xunsK1MiDPVkWZVEA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 3:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> I see that these two answers are both exactly multiples of 24 hours away
> >> from the given origin.  But if I'm binning on the basis of "days" or
> >> larger units, I would sort of expect to get local midnight, and I'm not
> >> getting that once I cross a DST boundary.
>
> > Hmm, that's seems like a reasonable expectation. I can get local midnight
> > if I recast to timestamp:
>
> > # select date_bin('1 day', '2021-11-10 00:00 +00'::timestamptz::timestamp,
> > '2021-09-01 00:00 -04'::timestamptz::timestamp);
> >       date_bin
> > ---------------------
> >  2021-11-09 00:00:00
> > (1 row)
>
> Yeah, and then back to timestamptz if that's what you really need :-(
>
> > It's a bit unintuitive, though.
>
> Agreed.  If we keep it like this, adding some documentation around
> the point would be a good idea I think.

Attached is a draft doc patch using the above examples. Is there anything else that would be useful to mention?

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marcos Pegoraro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Trigger position
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY