We are working to avoid this limitation.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Documentation of jsonb tells that jsonb documents should be kept at a
>> reasonable size to reduce lock contention, but there is no mention of
>> size limitation for indexes:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/datatype-json.html
>
> It seems like your complaint is that this warrants special
> consideration from the jsonb docs, due to this general limitation
> being particularly likely to affect jsonb users. Is that accurate?
>
> The structure of the JSON in your test case is quite atypical, since
> there is one huge string containing each of the translations, rather
> than a bunch of individual array elements (one per translation) or a
> bunch of object pairs.
>
> As it happens, just this morning I read that MongoDB's new version 2.6
> now comes with stricter enforcement of key length:
> http://docs.mongodb.org/master/release-notes/2.6-compatibility/#index-key-length-incompatibility
> . While previous versions just silently failed to index values that
> were inserted, there is now a 1024 limit imposed on the total size of
> indexed values.
>
> --
> Peter Geoghegan
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers