Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jing Wang
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
Дата
Msg-id CAF3+xMLP0uL3Mp=8f3rWz9G_qTAXRgjZu6AR3TJu2J84OUAN_A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE  (Jing Wang <jingwangian@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi 

I don't know why the previous email can't be linked with the original email webpage. It is weird. So supplementing following information for understanding: 

The original email link: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAF3%2BxM%2BxSswcWQZMP1cjj12gPz8DXHcM9_fT1y-0fVzxi9pmOw%40mail.gmail.com

The recent email with updated patch is as following:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAF3%2BxMKkKpd8oVRpN9i1BFMau2dFhVrt-Y0BE%3DDsoKtOm%3DC2AQ%40mail.gmail.com

--
Regards,
Jing Wang
Fujitsu Australia

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] heap/SLRU verification, relfrozenxid cut-off, and freeze-the-dead bug(Was: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool))