Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jing Wang
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
Дата
Msg-id CAF3+xMK2xt_CF6vTDcwN=icDcTZ2YJpc8PBPGJCP+688-bDFTA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE  (Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE  (Jing Wang <jingwangian@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi Surafel,

>Your patch doesn't cover security labels on databases which have similar issue 
>and consider dividing the patch into two one for adding CURRENT_DATABASE as a
>database specifier and the other for adding database-level information to pg_dump output 
>in a way that allows to load a dump into a differently named database.

Thanks your review and suggestion. I will add them.


Regards,
Jing Wang
Fujitsu Australia

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Следующее
От: vinayak
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG: WHENEVER statement with DO CONTINUE action