Re: [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Geoff Winkless
Тема Re: [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?
Дата
Msg-id CAEzk6feX=KpxWWrb-HfxqidEso1YWKJkzNNOza7Ce6wyw0YDEw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?  (Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
On 17 October 2017 at 11:59, Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com> wrote:
What's the point of the seagate archive now ?
Ironwolf, for the same public price, have better performance (obviously) and, more surprising, a better MTBF.
 
​I have no real insight into whether Seagate are still pursuing the product design, but I'm not really surprised that the MTBF is worse: if the shingled disk must write some tracks twice for each individual track write, it seems logical that there will be more write stress and therefore shortened lifespan, no?

Geoff

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laurent Laborde
Дата:
Сообщение: [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?
Следующее
От: david.turon@linuxbox.cz
Дата:
Сообщение: [GENERAL] COPY log row count feauture request