On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 12:45, Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 01:05, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> > It would be convenient if the first patch could be treated
> > as an independent thing.
>
> Patch 0002 was the reason for writing 0001, and uses the performance
> improvements of 0001 to show it's worth. As such, I submitted them as
> a set. If you'd like, I could submit 0002 seperately?
For now, version 2 of the patchset to make MSVC and cfbot happy (only
fixes the compilation issues, no significant changes). I'll try to
benchmark the patches in this patchset (both 0001, and 0001+0002) in
the upcoming weekend.
Kind regards,
Matthias van de Meent.