Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthias van de Meent
Тема Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal
Дата
Msg-id CAEze2Wj8Za=p+sOW=w_rEYnSykmeFoLo9+rxyPyahBE0qRz-eA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 17:04, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 7:51 AM Matthias van de Meent
> <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think that mostly has to do with reliability / stability of ORDER BY
> > in combination with LIMIT and OFFSET, even though right now we cannot
> > fully guarantee such stability due to unstable results from underlying
> > plan nodes.
>
> The current qsort isn't stable.

Then I misunderstood Robert's comment, thanks for correcting me.

- Matthias

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: some aspects of our qsort might not be ideal
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: allow specifying action when standby encounters incompatible parameter settings