Re: postgresql-9.5.3 compilation on Solaris SPARC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Venkata Balaji N
Тема Re: postgresql-9.5.3 compilation on Solaris SPARC
Дата
Msg-id CAEyp7J9tOi1k_uv8ocs2BM2K1x=Ok73zF=nK3O5kd3A8eDd3BQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: postgresql-9.5.3 compilation on Solaris SPARC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: postgresql-9.5.3 compilation on Solaris SPARC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Venkata Balaji N <nag1010@gmail.com> writes:
> "make" command is generating the following error while compiling
> postgresql-9.5.3 on Solaris SPARC.

> Undefined                       first referenced
> symbol                             in file
> atomic_cas_64                       port/atomics.o
> atomic_cas_32                       port/atomics.o

Hmm.  Do you get any warnings about references to those functions earlier
in the build?

I do not see any such similar warnings earlier in the build. 

src/include/port/atomics/generic-sunpro.h cites these references
as authority for believing that those functions exist in Solaris: 

Yes, i could see the references mentioned in the above file.
 

   http://www.unix.com/man-page/opensolaris/3c/atomic_cas/
   http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1465/atomic-cas-3c.html

I see that the first of those mentions it's for SunOS 5.11 whereas your
machine says it's 5.10 ... is it possible the functions were new in 5.11?

I am not 100% sure. By the error, what i understand is that for some reason PostgreSQL version 9.5.x is expecting the SunOS version to be more recent than 5.10. 

We would need to compile PostgreSQL-9.5.3 to upgrade our customer's production environments. We did not have problems compiling earlier versions of PostgreSQL.

Regards,
Venkata B N

Fujitsu Australia

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Steve Atkins
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Thoughts on "Love Your Database"
Следующее
От: Szymon Lipiński
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Thoughts on "Love Your Database"