Re: effective_cache_size X shared_buffer

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Venkata B Nagothi
Тема Re: effective_cache_size X shared_buffer
Дата
Msg-id CAEyp7J8LwYy3uruW20=mzSwZ10qe9w+ECBvsqQX1reEi+h1z7g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: effective_cache_size X shared_buffer  (Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
 

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com> wrote:
2017-04-03 13:23 GMT+12:00 Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>:
Hi guys.

I'm thinking about increasing the query cache for my PG 9.2 server.
I've got a project happening, which is doing lots and lots of writes and reads during the night, and in the morning I see PG cache warming up again, as all the cache "was used" by those write and read tasks.

So my environment gets very slow for a few hours, until the queries used on a daily basis go to the cache.

Question:
Should I increase effective_cache_size or shared_buffer? What's the difference between them?

Thanks
Patrick

Can I also increase shared_buffer on my slave only? Would that make any difference if using selects on the slave? Or this parameter must be the same across all servers (Master/slaves) ?

Yes, you can increase the shared_buffers in the slave database. Configuration can be different across master and slave databases.

Regards,

Venkata B N
Database Consultant

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Venkata B Nagothi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: effective_cache_size X shared_buffer
Следующее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: Suggestion to improve select pg_reload_conf()