Re: Vacuum Full - Questions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Venkata B Nagothi
Тема Re: Vacuum Full - Questions
Дата
Msg-id CAEyp7J-qYvquD3TrQEBNsJ0TDJPSvS7WYv-qyUCEhFinN_bnrQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Vacuum Full - Questions  (Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Vacuum Full - Questions  (Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys,

A dev has ran a VACUUM FULL command into our test database running PostgreSQL 9.5 (I know... goddamn!!!!)...

... after the Vacuum Full, some queries start using SEQ scans instead of indexes...

Does that happen because of the size of the table? The table that I'm referring to is 150MB big after the vacuum (Before was 1G)...

Yes, it is possible that sequential scans after vacuum full are cheaper than Index scans before vacuum full ? do you see improvement in query response times ? 
How does the cost differ ?

Regards,
Venkata B N

Fujitsu Australia

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adam Brusselback
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum Full - Questions
Следующее
От: Patrick B
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum Full - Questions