Re: Infinite Interval

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: Infinite Interval
Дата
Msg-id CAExHW5vn6iKe_9XLAf+yqz0tnVHeDXvoBg45Ybqd9n-mDByEFQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Infinite Interval  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Infinite Interval
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 5:32 PM Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 06:56, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 14:33, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ah, Windows Server didn't like that. Trying again with "INT64CONST(0)"
> > > instead of just "0" in interval_um().
> > >
> > I found this:
> > https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/please-implement-integer-overflow-detection/409051
> > maybe related.
>
> Hmm, actually, this has revealed a bug in our 64-bit integer
> subtraction code, on platforms that don't have builtins or 128-bit
> integer support. I have created a new thread for that, since it's
> nothing to do with this patch.

Just to test whether that bug fix also fixes the failure seen with
this patchset, I am attaching the patchset including the patch with
the fix.

0001 - fix in other thread
0002 and 0003 are 0001 and 0002 in the previous patch set.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Следующее
От: Junwang Zhao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: make pg_ctl more friendly