Re: outdated comment in table_tuple_update definition
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: outdated comment in table_tuple_update definition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAExHW5ssNtYX1G4QDkq9FoU222-CubfxdFjyjEty+LT_eas22Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | outdated comment in table_tuple_update definition (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 3:08 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 6 Feb 2025, at 20:00, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> wrote: > > > I found that the parameter type was changed by commit 19d8e23 (Ignore BRIN indexes when checking for HOT updates), butthe comment was not updated. Looks like oversight. > > I agree with your analysis, unless objected to I'll apply the attached in > shortly to update the documentation. + * update_indexes - in successful cases this indicates the index types + * which require new index entries for this tuple AFAIK, summarising indexes may not necessarily always need a new entry. So the following sentence looks more accurate in successful cases, this indicates the types of indexes (summarising vs non-summarising) which need an update based on this tuple. The text in the parenthese would clarify "index types", but if it's too verbose, it may be omitted. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: