Re: Remove duplicate table scan in logical apply worker and code refactoring

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: Remove duplicate table scan in logical apply worker and code refactoring
Дата
Msg-id CAExHW5sLgeHiixU_WBLM0MmE=0BtrWC=d6Kj=D=nxBQTG8qsAA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove duplicate table scan in logical apply worker and code refactoring  (Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 5:56 PM Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> wrote:

> > +/*
> > + * If the tuple to be modified could not be found, a log message is emitted.
> > + */
> > +static void
> > +report_tuple_not_found(CmdType cmd, Relation targetrel, bool is_partition)
> > +{
> > + Assert(cmd == CMD_UPDATE || cmd == CMD_DELETE);
> > +
> > + /* XXX should this be promoted to ereport(LOG) perhaps? */
> > + elog(DEBUG1,
> > + "logical replication did not find row to be %s in replication target relation%s \"%s\"",
> > + cmd == CMD_UPDATE ? "updated" : "deleted",
> > + is_partition ? "'s partition" : "",
> > + RelationGetRelationName(targetrel));
> > +}
>
> Encapsulating report logic inside function is ok, but double ternary
> expression is a bit out of line. I do not see similar places within
> PostgreSQL,
> so it probably violates code style.
>

They it's written, it would make it hard for the translations. See [1]
which redirects to [2].

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/error-style-guide.html
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/nls-programmer.html#NLS-GUIDELINES

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions
Следующее
От: "Li, Yong"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations