Quick description: After upgrading our Aurora PostgreSQL engine from v11 to v15, one of our often run SQL's started taking tens of seconds instead of running sub 100ms. Explain analyze showed that the query planner had switched to using incremental sort. Running ANALYZE on the table fixed the issue temporarily, but it came back after few days.
I'm looking to dig a bit deeper to be able to submit a bug report to the PostgreSQL team so maybe something can be done to fix this, as this definitely feels as a bug (the query running times are 100x in difference) but I need a bit of help as I'm new to this deep PostgreSQL analysis and I'm struggling finding resource how to proceed in such a case. And maybe it's an issue with my own setup or database configuration instead (ie. me just being stupid).
I know that I can solve the issue for my own environments with turning incremental sort off in the DB parameters, but I feel this might be worth putting a bit time into to be able to find the root cause and help me understand the planner a bit better.
More detailed description:
Note: I don't have reproduction steps at this time, this is one of the reasons I'm asking help to figure out what could I try to do to start trying reproducing this in local setup. Below info is just giving out as much info as I can to help understand the setup I have.
The query under question is rather simplistic as far as SQL itself goes at least (attached: original_query.sql):
select * from "products" inner join "shops" on "shops"."id" = "products"."shop_id" where "products"."status" = 'published' and products.desc_tsv @@ to_tsquery('simple', 'nike:*') order by "products"."pinned_at" ASC, "products"."listed_at" DESC limit 61;
I've tried to include as slim table / index setup as possible, but the tables are actually bigger and there are a lot more indexes present, I don't know how other indexes and / or columns might affect the planner path in this case.
https://dbdiagram.io/d/64771e48722eb7749422715e (attached: schema_setup.sql)
In production DB the size of products table is around 5 452 840 rows.
According to the information_schema the size of the products table is around 8.1GB.
If the incremental sort query plan starts happening, running ANALYZE products; fixes the issue and the planner switches back to the original plan.
What am I asking for?
Any ideas / help / queries that would get me closer to understanding why planner chooses so much slower query in this case or ideas how to start trying to reproduce this locally as it seems to happen intermittently in production environment, I'm unsure if I can replicate that type of load locally. Maybe someone spots very obvious mistakes / issues with the table / index / query setup right away that I've missed.
Any help appreciated,
Henrik.