Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ranier Vilela
Тема Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Дата
Msg-id CAEudQAqh6vn8WyL7MFULCOca08ZVEwTsgUFzP_OXvseYC7Uwkw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Em seg., 14 de jun. de 2021 às 21:01, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> escreveu:
I took it a step further.

Transactions

HEAD                      patched
10002207                10586781
10146167                10388685
10048919                10333359
10065764,3333333 10436275                 3,55021946687555

TPS
HEAD                       patched
33469,016009         35399,010472
33950,624679         34733,252336
33639,8429             34578,495043
33686,4945293333 34903,5859503333 3,48700968070122

3,55% Is it worth touch procarray.c for real?

With msvc 64 bits, the asm generated:
HEAD
213.731 bytes procarray.asm
patched
212.035 bytes procarray.asm

Patch attached.

regards,
Ranier Vilela

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ranier Vilela
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Fix buffer not null terminated on (ecpg lib)
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety