Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ranier Vilela
Тема Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Дата
Msg-id CAEudQAqeih_AFWng0nGOmchQaUZBxMomq=2vT4VCWdTDA3jkAw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Список pgsql-hackers
Em qui., 15 de jul. de 2021 às 10:04, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> escreveu:
Em qui., 15 de jul. de 2021 às 10:01, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> escreveu:
Thanks, David.

> I lost where. Can you show me?

See the attached warnings.txt.
Thank you.
 

> But the benchmark came from:
> pgbench -i -p 5432 -d postgres
> pgbench -c 50 -T 300 -S -n

I'm afraid this tells nothing unless you also provide the
configuration files and the hardware description, and also some
information on how you checked that there is no performance
degradation on all the other supported platforms and possible
configurations.
 
Benchmarking is a very complicated topic - trust me,
been there!
Absolutely.
 

It would be better to submit two separate patches, the one that
addresses Size_t and another that addresses shadowing. Refactorings
only, nothing else.

Regarding the code formatting, please see src/tools/pgindent.
I will try.
Here are the two patches.
As suggested, reclassified as refactoring only.

regards,
Ranier Vilela
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] psql: \dn+ to show size of each schema (and \dA+ for AMs)