Re: Simplify the logic a bit (src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c)
| От | Ranier Vilela |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Simplify the logic a bit (src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEudQAoXZGQNgk2M4rW3vs_C5_X9Y09QsYawZLRxV15W+D329Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Simplify the logic a bit (src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c) (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Simplify the logic a bit (src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Álvaro.
Em qui., 27 de fev. de 2025 às 16:50, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
On 2025-Feb-14, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Attached is the prototype version v1.
> What do you think?
I think this is still a bit confused. The new function's comment says
"prepare the list of tables to ..." but what it really receives is a
list of _indexes_ (as evidenced by the fact that they're compared to
pg_index.indexrelid). So on input the user_list is an index list, and
on output it has been changed into a list of tables, and the list of
indexes is the function's return value? That seems quite weird.
Yeah, I think that is confusing.
I
propose to change the API of this new function thus:
static void
get_parallel_tabidx_list(PGconn *conn,
SimpleStringList *index_list,
SimpleStringList *table_list,
bool echo);
where index_list is inout and the table_list is just an output argument.
Ok.
I would also remove the 'type' argument, because I don't see a need to
keep it.
Ok.
Thanks for your guidance.
v2 attached, please comment if you have any further objections.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: