Re: [PATCH] ltree hash functions

Thanks.

I've attached the latest version that updates the naming in line with
the convention.

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:46 AM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 8:44 AM Tommy Pavlicek <tommypav122@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Patch updated for those comments (and a touch of cleanup in the tests) attached.
>
> it would be a better name as hash_ltree than ltree_hash, similar logic
> applies to ltree_hash_extended.
> that would be the convention. see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/69650940/15603477
>
>
> Other than that, it looks good.