Re: psql color hostname prompt

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Steve Crawford
Тема Re: psql color hostname prompt
Дата
Msg-id CAEfWYyygPofj3HOLZW1YfWG_BD05NJddoZGKHbX4OgKmXQZuVw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql color hostname prompt  (Cal Heldenbrand <cal@fbsdata.com>)
Ответы Re: psql color hostname prompt  (Cal Heldenbrand <cal@fbsdata.com>)
Список pgsql-general
2)  %M vs shell call

%M on when connected to the local machine displays the string "[local]" which I didn't like.  I wanted a real hostname to show no matter which client/server pair I was using.  Zero chance for mistaken commands on the wrong host.  Many times we ssh to a remote server, then run psql locally.

Perhaps the more elegant route here, is to change psql's behavior with %M when connected to the local machine?  (This would also solve point #3)


There is a basic problem - what is the hostname?

1.2.3.4? db23.example.com? server42? 127.0.0.1? 192.168.54.23? Those could all be the same PostgreSQL instance, all different or some mix. And we haven't even considered local Unix connections, servers running on different ports and the fact that localhost is machine specific and non-fully-qualified names that depend on resolver search orders.

One possible solution would be to essentially do the reverse of application_name. I.e. do something along the lines of adding a server-side parameter to specify the name of the server instance that would be exchanged in the startup handshake and made available to client processes.

I could see some value in that but can't speak to the work and possible wire-protocol breakage that might be involved relative to the benefits.

Cheers,
Steve

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Cal Heldenbrand
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql color hostname prompt
Следующее
От: George Neuner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10?