Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
Дата
Msg-id CAEepm=3ichiujMnbpJDFibEfFJ_unDEQF-UUW-dGc5Won14fJg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II  (Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> wrote:
> v20 patch set (I was trying 0008, 0009 patch)  not getting cleanly apply on
> latest commit also getting compilation error due to refactor in below
> commit.
>
> commit 0c5803b450e0cc29b3527df3f352e6f18a038cc6

Hi Rushabh

I am about to post a new patch set that fixes the deadlock problem,
but in the meantime here is a rebase of those two patches (numbers
changed to 0006 + 0007).  In the next version I think I should
probably remove that 'stripe' concept.  The idea was to spread
temporary files over the available temporary tablespaces, but it's a
terrible API, since you have to promise to use the same stripe number
when opening the same name later... Maybe I should use a hash of the
name for that instead.  Thoughts?

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0
Следующее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints inpostgres_fdw