On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Also ... if we were to rename it, it should be "pg_wal" or "pg_xact".
> Please let's not add yet another term for the WAL.
+1 for pg_wal if it has to be renamed.
If pg_clog also has to be renamed, how about using your other
suggestion "pg_xact" for that? It fits alongside pg_multixact.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com