An out-of-date comment in nodeIndexonlyscan.c
| От | Thomas Munro |
|---|---|
| Тема | An out-of-date comment in nodeIndexonlyscan.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEepm=2GK3FVdnt5V3d+h9njWipCv_fNL=wjxyUhzsF=0PcbNg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: An out-of-date comment in nodeIndexonlyscan.c
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
Since commit cdf91edb (2012), nodeIndexonlyscan.c says:
/*
* Predicate locks for index-only scans must be
acquired at the page
* level when the heap is not accessed, since
tuple-level predicate
* locks need the tuple's xmin value. If we had to
visit the tuple
* anyway, then we already have the tuple-level lock
and can skip the
* page lock.
*/
if (tuple == NULL)
PredicateLockPage(scandesc->heapRelation,
ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(tid),
estate->es_snapshot);
The first sentence of that comment is no longer true as of commit
c01262a8 (2013). As for whether it's necessary to predicate-lock the
whole eheap page (rather than the heap tuple) anyway because of HOT
update chains, I don't know, so I'm not sure what wording to propose
instead.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: