Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT
Дата
Msg-id CAEepm=1ypxjBG-zhCnr2aabp86Kd_a9OppKMMUhhSyQd3yfG3g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> I suppose you'll need two tuplestores for the ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE
>> case -- one for updated tuples, and the other for inserted tuples.
>
> [...]
>
> Here is a patch implementing the above.  It should be applied on top
> of transition-tuples-from-wctes-v2.patch[2].

Here's a new version of patch #3.  It's rebased on top of
transition-tuples-from-wctes-v3.patch.  I also moved a comment for
execReplication.c out of this patch into patch #2, correcting a
mistake in my pancake stacking.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table
Следующее
От: Jeevan Ladhe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning