On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> So perhaps I should get rid of that replication_lag_sample_interval
> GUC and send back apply timestamps frequently, as you were saying. It
> would add up to a third more replies.
Oops, of course I meant to say up to 50% more replies...
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com