On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> The CF status of this patch turned into "Waiting on Author" by
> automated CI checking. However, I still don't get any error even
> on the current master (69835bc) after make distclean. Also I
> don't see any difference between the "problematic" patch and my
> working branch has nothing different other than patching line
> shifts. (So I haven't post a new one.)
>
> I looked on the location heapam.c:2502 where the CI complains at
> in my working branch and I found a different code with the
> complaint.
>
> https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/274777750
>
> 1363 heapam.c:2502:18: error: ‘HEAP_INSERT_SKIP_WAL’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> 1364 if (!(options & HEAP_INSERT_SKIP_WAL) && RelationNeedsWAL(relation))
>
> heapam.c:2502@work branch
> 2502: /* XLOG stuff */
> 2503: if (BufferNeedsWAL(relation, buffer))
>
> So I conclude that the CI mechinery failed to applly the patch
> correctly.
Hi Horiguchi-san,
Hmm. Here is that line in heamap.c in unpatched master:
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c;h=d20f0381f3bc23f99c505ef8609d63240ac5d44b;hb=HEAD#l2485
It says:
2485 if (!(options & HEAP_INSERT_SKIP_WAL) && RelationNeedsWAL(relation))
After applying fix-wal-level-minimal-michael-horiguchi-3.patch from
this message:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170912.131441.20602611.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp
... that line is unchanged, although it has moved to line number 2502.
It doesn't compile for me, because your patch removed the definition
of HEAP_INSERT_SKIP_WAL but hasn't removed that reference to it.
I'm not sure what happened. Is it possible that your patch was not
created by diffing against master?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers