Re: dsm_unpin_segment

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: dsm_unpin_segment
Дата
Msg-id CAEepm=0kaqZEM7AZADSCfik065z__7khNvRog8mn-cV+dUK3RA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: dsm_unpin_segment  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: dsm_unpin_segment  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> + int control_slot = -1;
> ...
> + if (control_slot == -1)
> + elog(ERROR, "cannot unpin unknown segment handle");
>
> Isn't it better to use INVALID_CONTROL_SLOT for control_slot and use
> datatype as uint32 (same is used for dsm_segment->control_slot and
> nitems)?

Yes, it is better.  New version attached.

> Apart from this, I have verified your patch on Windows using attached
> dsm_demo module.  Basically, by using dsm_demo_create(), I have pinned
> the segment and noticed that Handle count of postmaster is incremented
> by 1 and then by using dsm_demo_unpin_segment() unpinned the segment
> which decrements the Handle count in Postmaster.

Thanks!

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LSN as a recovery target
Следующее
От: Kuntal Ghosh
Дата:
Сообщение: WAL consistency check facility