On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I think we should take the hint in the comments and make it O(1)
> anyway. See attached draft patch.
Alternatively, here is a shorter and sweeter dlist version (I did the
open-coded one thinking of theoretical back-patchability).
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com