Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Дата
Msg-id CAEepm=0EvDYJFVYOSZuOBF52F3D2Df35Vij7ehm5nDpQ4ohSGQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the overall patch set:
>
> - I am curious to know how this has been tested.  How much of the new
> code is covered by the tests in 0007-Partition-wise-join-tests.patch?
> How much does coverage improve with
> 0008-Extra-testcases-for-partition-wise-join-NOT-FOR-COMM.patch?  What
> code, if any, is not covered by either of those test suites?  Could we
> do meaningful testing of this with something like Andreas
> Seltenreich's sqlsmith?

FWIW I'm working on an answer to both of those question, but keep
getting distracted by other things catching on fire...

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SendRowDescriptionMessage() is slow for queries with alot of columns
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256