Re: numeric_big in make check?

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 15:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> > Looking at the script itself, the addition, subtraction,
> > multiplication and division tests at the top are probably pointless,
> > since I would expect those operations to be tested adequately (and
> > probably more thoroughly) by the transcendental test cases. In fact, I
> > think it would probably be OK to delete everything above line 650, and
> > just keep the bottom half of the script -- the pow(), exp(), ln() and
> > log() tests, which cover various edge cases, as well as exercising
> > basic arithmetic operations internally.
>
> I could go with that, but let's just transpose those into numeric.
>

Works for me.

Regards,
Dean