Re: timestamptz parsing bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dean Rasheed
Тема Re: timestamptz parsing bug?
Дата
Msg-id CAEZATCX893NNUzhtBz7-+SA3mLLNrbV5M4s1twygV86Zu6nX5g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на timestamptz parsing bug?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: timestamptz parsing bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: timestamptz parsing bug?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 29 August 2011 15:40, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> Why do we parse this as a correct timestamptz literal:
>
>    2011-08-29T09:11:14.123 CDT
>
> but not this:
>
>    2011-08-29T09:11:14.123 America/Chicago
>
> Replace the ISO-8601 style T between the date and time parts of the latter
> with a space and the parser is happy again.
>
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>

Funny, I've just recently been looking at this code.

I think that the issue is in the DTK_TIME handling code in DecodeDateTime().

For this input string the "T" is recognised as the start of an ISO
time, and the ptype variable is set to DTK_TIME. The next field is a
DTK_TIME, however, when it is handled it doesn't reset the ptype
variable.

When it gets to the timezone "America/Chicago" at the end, this is
handled in the DTK_DATE case, because of the "/". But because ptype is
still set, it is expecting this to be an ISO time, so it errors out.

The attached patch seems to fix it. Could probably use a new
regression test though.

Regards,
Dean

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: spinlocks on HP-UX
Следующее
От: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem