On 10 November 2016 at 17:12, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yeah, I think we'd be best off to avoid the bare term "security".
> It's probably too late to change the RTE field name "securityQuals",
> but maybe we could uniformly call those "security barrier quals" in
> the comments. Then the basic terminology is that we have security
> barrier views and row-level security both implemented on top of
> security barrier quals, and we should be careful to use the right
> one of those three terms in comments/documentation.
>
+1 for that terminology and no renaming of fields.
Regards,
Dean