Re: WITH CHECK OPTION bug [was RLS Design]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dean Rasheed
Тема Re: WITH CHECK OPTION bug [was RLS Design]
Дата
Msg-id CAEZATCVRMrJk85CPKQpqCzHyAGJSSi1OSqo=WtfMdrBod_ogKQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WITH CHECK OPTION bug [was RLS Design]  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: WITH CHECK OPTION bug [was RLS Design]  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: WITH CHECK OPTION bug [was RLS Design]  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 20 September 2014 14:08, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fortunately it looks pretty trivial though. The patch attached fixes
>> the above test cases.
>> Obviously this needs to be fixed in 9.4 and HEAD.
> Wouldn't it be better if bundled with some regression tests?

Yeah OK, fair point. Here are some tests that cover that code path.
I've also thrown in a test with prepared statements, although that
case was already working, it seemed worth checking.

Regards,
Dean

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Help to startup
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: proposal: window function - change_number