Re: More inaccurate results from numeric pow()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dean Rasheed
Тема Re: More inaccurate results from numeric pow()
Дата
Msg-id CAEZATCV9JjGeCx=p414XB-yRsk5cb_V6rLq4jxK67pM0TnVeQQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: More inaccurate results from numeric pow()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2 May 2016 at 18:38, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't much care for the hardwired magic number here, especially since
> exp_var() does not have its limit expressed as "6000" but as
> "NUMERIC_MAX_RESULT_SCALE * 3".  I think you should rephrase the limit
> to use that expression, and also add something like this in exp_var():

OK, that makes sense. Done that way.

Regards,
Dean



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Teodor Sigaev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: atomic pin/unpin causing errors
Следующее
От: Gavin Flower
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Naming of new tsvector functions